The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains: Insights From Simple Models
Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2012.2203304 · Cited by 1,288
Climate risks and market efficiency
Hong, H., Li, F. W., & Xu, J. (2019) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.09.015 · Cited by 967
Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments
Stavins, R. N. (2003) · Handbook of Environmental Economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0099(03)01014-3 · Cited by 732
Koch, N., Fuss, S., Grosjean, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.024 · Cited by 448
The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: Evidence from microdata
Martin, R., de Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.016 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Montgomery, W. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Theory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1972-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 395-418
- ISSN
- 0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002493340
- Cited by
- 1,781
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-x
- The paper
- Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
