Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 624

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competitive and optimal responses to signals: An analysis of efficiency and distribution

Spence, Michael·1974·Journal of Economic Theory

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0531(74)90098-2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Rothschild, 1971, The Persistence of Error: A Useful Fact About Two-Armed Bandit Problems
  2. Schelling, 1972, Hockey helmets, concealed weapons and daylight saving, Harvard University, Public Policy Program, Discussion Paper No. 9
  3. Spence, 1974, Market Signalling: Information Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes
  4. Zeckhauser, 1972, Risk spreading and distribution, Harvard University, Public Policy Program, Discussion Paper No. 10

Metadata

Authors
Spence, M.
Venue
Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
296-332
ISSN
0022-0531
Cited by
624
References
9
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.