Use of first person pronouns as a function of increased objective self-awareness and performance feedback
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific self-focusing stimuli such as cameras, audiences, recordings, and mirrors have been tested in controlled settings to stimulate self-awareness.
“Specific B self-focusing stimuli ^ such as cameras, audiences, recordings, and mirrors have been tested in controlled settings to stimulate self-awareness (Buss 1980; Carver and Scheier 1978; Davis and Brock 1975; Davis and Franzoi 1991; Geller and Shaver 1976; Morin 2002).”
From Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers (2018) · cites this paper as Davis and Brock 1975
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 254
- Authors
- Davis, D., & Brock, T. C.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Deborah
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-388
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062176427
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- objective self-awareness, first-person pronouns, self-focus, attentional avoidance, performance feedback, negative feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review