Dimensional asymmetry in attributional inference
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is much less plausible that someone who is not athletic but is motivated to appear to be a good athlete could behave in a very athletic fashion for any length of time than that someone motivated to appear culturally literate could act culturally literate during a brief interaction.
“Whereas virtually anyone who is motivated to deceive another by appearing to be culturally literate, for example, could act in a culturally literate manner during a brief interaction (if given some time to prepare), it is much less plausible that someone who is not athletic but is motivated to appear to be a good athlete could behave in a very athletic fashion for any length of time”
From Suspicion and Dispositional Inference (1993) · cites this paper as Reeder et al., 1977
Cites
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · see citing works
Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.
Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. (1961) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048514 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.1.61 · Cited by 723 · see citing works
Self-citationSuspicion and Dispositional Inference
Hilton, J. L., Fein, S., & Miller, D. T. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195003 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Judging others in the shadow of suspicion
Fein, S., & Hilton, J. L. (1994) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf02249398 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Fletcher, G. J. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.3.203 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reeder, G. D., Messick, D. M., & Van Avermaet, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reeder, Glenn D
- ORCID
- Reeder, Glenn D
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-57
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008454491
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- role-taking ability, interpersonal differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
