Cited by 211RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryRNA modifications and cancer

Context effects: Translation of UAG codon by suppressor tRNA is affected by the sequence following UAG in the message

Bossi, Lionello·1983·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

The efficiency of various suppressor tRNAs in reading the UAG amber codon has been measured at 42 sites in the lacI gene. Results indicate that: (1) for all suppressors, efficiency is not an a priori value; rather, it is determined at each site by the specific reading context of the suppressed codon; (2) the degree of sensitivity to context effects differs among suppressors. Most affected is amber suppressor supE (su2), whose activity varies over a 20-fold range depending on context; (3) context effects are produced by residues present at the 3' side of the UAG codon. The most important role appears to be played by the base that is immediately adjacent to the codon. When this base is a purine, the amber codon is suppressed more efficiently than when a pyrimidine is in the same position. Superimposed on this initial pattern, the influence of bases further downstream to the UAG triplet can be detected also. The possibility is discussed that context effects are produced by the whole codon following UAG in the message.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90088-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural UAG readthrough frequency is mostly within the range of 1.1 × 10−4 to 7 × 10−3, depending on the nature of the downstream nucleotides.

    “Natural UAG readthrough frequency is mostly within the range of 1.1 × 10−4 to 7 × 10−3, depending on the nature of the downstream nucleotides [70,71,72,73].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bossi, L.
Affiliations
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Bossi, Lionello
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-02
Volume
164
Issue
1
Pages
73-87
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992274755
Cited by
211
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
context effects, UAG codon, amber codon, suppressor tRNA, SU(2), lacI gene, translation efficiency
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, beta-Galactosidase, Codon, Escherichia coli, Genes, Bacterial, Lac Operon, Mutation, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Transfer, Salmonella typhimurium, Suppression, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review