Context effects: Translation of UAG codon by suppressor tRNA is affected by the sequence following UAG in the message
Abstract
The efficiency of various suppressor tRNAs in reading the UAG amber codon has been measured at 42 sites in the lacI gene. Results indicate that: (1) for all suppressors, efficiency is not an a priori value; rather, it is determined at each site by the specific reading context of the suppressed codon; (2) the degree of sensitivity to context effects differs among suppressors. Most affected is amber suppressor supE (su2), whose activity varies over a 20-fold range depending on context; (3) context effects are produced by residues present at the 3' side of the UAG codon. The most important role appears to be played by the base that is immediately adjacent to the codon. When this base is a purine, the amber codon is suppressed more efficiently than when a pyrimidine is in the same position. Superimposed on this initial pattern, the influence of bases further downstream to the UAG triplet can be detected also. The possibility is discussed that context effects are produced by the whole codon following UAG in the message.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Natural UAG readthrough frequency is mostly within the range of 1.1 × 10−4 to 7 × 10−3, depending on the nature of the downstream nucleotides.
“Natural UAG readthrough frequency is mostly within the range of 1.1 × 10−4 to 7 × 10−3, depending on the nature of the downstream nucleotides [70,71,72,73].”
From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adding New Chemistries to the Genetic Code
Liu, C. C., & Schultz, P. G. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.105824 · Cited by 1,725 · see citing works
Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli.
Gutman, G. A., & Hatfield, G. W. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.10.3699 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines
Xia, X. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9070734 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bossi, L.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bossi, Lionello
- ORCID
- Bossi, Lionello
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-87
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992274755
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
- Keywords
- context effects, UAG codon, amber codon, suppressor tRNA, SU(2), lacI gene, translation efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, beta-Galactosidase, Codon, Escherichia coli, Genes, Bacterial, Lac Operon, Mutation, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Transfer, Salmonella typhimurium, Suppression, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review