Cited by 1,206Material Dynamics and PropertiesMetallic Glasses and Amorphous AlloysGlass properties and applications

Enthalpy relaxation and recovery in amorphous materials

Hodge, I.M.·1994·Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90321-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodge, I. M.
Affiliations
Carestream (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hodge, I.M.
Venue
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-04
Volume
169
Issue
3
Pages
211-266
ISSN
0022-3093 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971318238
Cited by
1,206
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 37
FWCI
24.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
Keywords
enthalpy relaxation, enthalpy recovery, amorphous materials, non-exponential relaxation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review