Cited by 47Aerogels and thermal insulationThermal properties of materialsHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thermal conductivity of silica aerogel powders at temperatures from 10 to 275 K

Rettelbach, Th., Säuberlich, J., Korder, S., Fricke, J.·1995·Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00051-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diffusion approximation approach is easy to use and has been widely used to calculate the radiative thermal conductivity of insulation materials such as open- and closed-cell foams, silica aerogel powders, and glass fibers.

    “The diffusion approximation approach is easy to use and has been widely used to calculate the radiative thermal conductivity of insulation materials such as openand closed-cell foams [17,53,67,87], silica aerogel powders [10,15,16,73], glass fibers and so forth.”
  • Rettelbach et al. reported apparent conductivity of aerogel under high vacuum (0.001 Pa) in the temperature range 10-275 K but lacks pressure variation.

    “Rettelbach et al. [73] reported apparent conductivity of aerogel under high vacuum condition (0.001Pa) in temperature range of 10 e 275 K but lacks the pressure variation.”
  • The fitted single-pore model shows very good agreement with measured high-vacuum conductivity of aerogel from Rettelbach et al. and Barrios over 10-275 K.

    “Fig. 14 shows very good agreement between the model prediction and measurement.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Scheuerpflug, 1992, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 145, 196, 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80455-7 · DOI
  2. Hümmer, 1992, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 145, 211, 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80458-2 · DOI
  3. Klemens, 1990, Vol. 21, 383
  4. Deprez, 1988, Solid State Commun., 66, 869, 10.1016/0038-1098(88)90403-6 · DOI
  5. Nilsson, 1990, Vol. 21, 359
  6. Kuhn, 1993, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 64, 2523, 10.1063/1.1143914 · DOI
  7. Scheuerpflug, 1991, J. Phys., D24, 1395
  8. Rettelbach, 1995, J. Phys., D28, 581
  9. Touloukian, 1970, Vol. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rettelbach, T., Säuberlich, J., Korder, S., & Fricke, J.
Affiliations
Bavarian Center for Applied Energy Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Rettelbach, Th.
Venue
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
186
Pages
278-284
ISSN
0022-3093 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089519172
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Keywords
thermal conductivity, grain-to-grain contacts, carbon black, phonon mean free path, nanoporosity, fused silica, perlite, temperature dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review