Cited by 107Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial factors and chronic pelvic pain: A comparison of women with endometriosis and with unexplained pain

Peveler, Robert, Edwards, Jacqueline, Daddow, Justin, Thomas, Eric·1996·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common clinical problem, and physical investigation often fails to reveal its cause. For this reason, it has been argued that psychological and social factors contribute to such "unexplained" pain. Few studies to date using well-validated psychometric measures and adequate sample sizes have compared patients with unexplained pain and those with identified physical disease. The present study compared pain severity, mood symptoms, personality characteristics and social adjustment in women with unexplained pain and women with endometriosis. Women with endometriosis were more likely to come from upper socioeconomic groups. No differences in mood symptoms or personality characteristics were identified, but women with endometriosis had somewhat more severe pain and greater social dysfunction than those with unexplained pain. Mood disorder and social dysfunction appear to be at least as important in patients with proven endometriosis as in those with unexplained pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00521-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Morris, 1958, Outpatient gynaecology, Br Med J, 236, 1030
  2. Feldman, 1987, Psychiatric disorder in medical inpatients, Q J Med, 241, 405

Metadata

Authors
Peveler, R., Edwards, J., Daddow, J., & Thomas, E.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Peveler, Robert
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-03
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
305-315
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040279179
Cited by
107
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, unexplained pain, psychosocial factors, mood symptoms, personality traits, social adaptation, socioeconomic status, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Pain Measurement, Personality Inventory, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review