Cited by 43Trigeminal Neuralgia and TreatmentsClassical Anatomy and HistologyPeripheral Nerve Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Histometric study of myelinated fibers in the human trigeminal nerve

Pennisi, E., Cruccu, G., Manfredi, M., Palladini, G.·1991·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

The trigeminal ganglion, roots and the initial portion of the ophthalmic, maxillary and mandibular nerves were dissected in 3 cadavers, to study the number, area and composition of the fascicles, and the density and diameter spectra of myelinated fibers. The total number of fibers (x 1000) was 26 in the ophthalmic, 50 in the maxillary, and 78 in the mandibular division, 7.7 in the motor root and 170 in the sensory root. In all nerves, the histograms of fiber diameter had a bimodal distribution. Cutaneous and muscle nerve fascicles clearly differed in the fiber density and diameter. The ophthalmic and maxillary nerves (cutaneous) had similar fascicles, and their maximum fiber diameter averaged 14.5 microns. Most fascicles of the mandibular nerve (probably cutaneous fascicles) closely resembled those of the ophthalmic and maxillary nerves, but in some fascicles (probably muscle nerves) the fibers were larger, with a maximum diameter of 19.3 microns. The findings in the three peripheral divisions agree with electrophysiological data about sensory and motor conduction in human trigeminal nerves. The observation that the ophthalmic and maxillary nerves have similar fiber spectra indicates that a special fiber composition does not account for the sparing of the ophthalmic division in trigeminal neuralgia. The absence of very large (A alpha) fibers in the sensory root does not support the view that impulses from muscle spindles are conducted along this root.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-510x(91)90113-l

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Buchthal, 1966, Number and diameter of myelinated fibres in the median nerve, Brain Res., 3, 85
  2. Buchthal, 1984, Sensory potentials of normal and diseased nerves, Vol. 1, 981
  3. Selby, 1984, Disease of the fifth cranial nerve, Vol. 2, 1224

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pennisi, E., Cruccu, G., Manfredi, M., & Palladini, G.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-09
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
22-28
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041288000
Cited by
43
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Classical Anatomy and Histology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Keywords
trigeminal nerve, myelinated axons, fiber diameter distribution, fiber density, trigeminal ganglion, ophthalmic nerve, maxillary nerve, mandibular nerve, trigeminal neuralgia, muscle spindle afferents
MeSH terms
Humans, Mandibular Nerve, Maxillary Nerve, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Trigeminal Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review