The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outline of a theory of thought-processes and thinking machines
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Thought-processes and certain typical mental phenomena are schematized into exact mathematical definitions, in terms of a theory which, with the assumption that learning is a relatively slow process, reduces to two sets of equations: “neuronic equations”, with fixed coefficients, which determine the instantaneous behavior, “mnemonic equations”, which determine the long-term behavior of a “model of the brain” or “thinking machine”. A qualitative but rigorous discussion shows that this machine exhibits, as a necessary consequence of the theory, many properties that are typical of the living brain: including need to “sleep”, ability spontaneously to form new ideas (patterns) which associate old ones, self-organization towards more reliable operation, and many others. Future works will deal with the quantitative solution of these equations and with concrete problems of construction—things that appear reasonably feasible. With a transposition of names, this theory could be applied to many sorts of social or, more generally, “collective” problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
Cited by
Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures
Grossberg, S. (1988) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(88)90021-4 · Cited by 1,623
An introduction to neural computing
Kohonen, T. (1988) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(88)90020-2 · Cited by 1,202
Learning Patterns and Pattern Sequences by Self-Organizing Nets of Threshold Elements
Amari, S.-I. (1972) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/t-c.1972.223477 · Cited by 474
Neural networks: An overview of early research, current frameworks and new challenges
Prieto, A., Prieto, B., Ortigosa, E. M., Ros, E., Pelayo, F., Ortega, J., & Rojas, I. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.06.014 · Cited by 391
Associative Dynamics in a Chaotic Neural Network
Adachi, M., & Aihara, K. (1997) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00061-5 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Caianiello, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1961-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-235
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037529930
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outline of a theory of thought-processes and thinking machines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-5193(61)90046-7
- The paper
- Caianiello, E. R. (1961). Outline of a theory of thought-processes and thinking machines. Journal of Theoretical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(61)90046-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.