Sensitization to stress: The enduring effects of prior stress on amphetamine-induced rotational behavior
Open accessAbstract
In rats with a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion of the substantia nigra exposure to footshock or immobilization stress produced a long-lasting enhancement in the rotational behavior evoked by a subsequent injection of amphetamine. However, the effect was dependent on the environmental context in which stress was applied. It is suggested that stress may induce enduring changes in brain and behavior similar to those produced by psychomotor stimulant drugs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stress, similar to drugs of abuse, may induce neurological changes that enhance dopaminergic activity and the attribution of incentive value to rewards and their cues.
“Stress, similar to drugs of abuse, may also induce neurological changes that enhance dopaminergic activity and the attribution of incentive value to rewards and their cues (Berridge, 2012; T. E. Robinson, Angus, & Becker, 1985; Yap et al., 2015).”
From Cued for Risk: Evidence for an Incentive Sensitization Framework to Explain the Interplay between Stress and Anxiety, Substance Abuse, and Reward Uncertainty in Disordered Gambling Behavior (2019) · cites this paper as T. E. Robinson, Angus, & Becker, 1985
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 114
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- D.S. SEGAL and M.A. SCHUCKIT, Stimulants: Neurochemical, Behavioral and Clinical Perspectives, ibid, pp. 131-167.
- T.E. ROBINSON, J.B. BECKER, C.J. MOORE, E. CASTANEDA and G. MITTLEMAN, Brain Res., in press (1985).
- Authors
- Robinson, T. E., Angus, A. L., & Becker, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1039-1042
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980756222
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH 37277)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 00844)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- stress sensitization, amphetamine-induced rotation, 6-hydroxydopamine lesion, substantia nigra, footshock, restraint stress, environmental context, psychostimulants, dopamine
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electroshock, Female, Humans, Hydroxydopamines, Immobilization, Rotation, Stereotyped Behavior, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Substantia Nigra, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
