Cited by 48Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Place preference conditioning with ventral tegmental injections of cytisine

Museo, Enrico, Wise, Roy A.·1994·Life Sciences

Abstract

The present experiment was designed to determine whether ventral tegmental injections of the nicotinic agonist cytisine can establish place preferences. Two groups of rats were tested: one group received injections into the ventral tegmentum and a second group received injections into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum; this latter group was used to assess whether the diffusion of drug into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum might in itself be sufficient to account for the effects associated with injections into the ventral tegmentum. A total of eight sets of injections were made. On days 1, 3, 5, and 7, animals were injected with cytisine (10 nmol per 0.5 microliter per side) and placed in one of the two main compartments of a place-preference apparatus. On days 2, 4, 6, and 8, injections of physiological saline, the drug vehicle, were paired with the other main compartment. Animals that received ventral tegmental injections of cytisine spent significantly more time in the cytisine-paired compartment than in the saline-paired compartment. Animals given cytisine injections into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum did not show a preference for the cytisine-paired compartment. These findings provide additional evidence in support of the hypothesis that nicotinic actions at the level of the ventral tegmentum contribute to the reinforcing actions of systemic injections of nicotine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00656-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Local infusion of a nicotinic agonist into the VTA, but not the NAc, is sufficient for nicotine place preference in rats.

    “This is consistent with previous studies suggesting that nAChRs within the VTA are critical for nicotine reward, because local infusion of a nicotinic agonist into the VTA, but not the NAc, is sufficient for nicotine place preference in the rat (Museo and Wise 1994).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Museo and Wise 1994

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 48

Authors
Museo, E., & Wise, R. A.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
55
Issue
15
Pages
1179-1186
ISSN
0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018307493
Cited by
48
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cytisine, nicotinic agonists, ventral tegmental area, place preference, self-administration, nicotine reinforcement, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, intracerebral injection
MeSH terms
Quinolizidine Alkaloids, Alkaloids, Animals, Azocines, Conditioning, Psychological, Injections, Locomotion, Male, Quinolizines, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review