Place preference conditioning with ventral tegmental injections of cytisine
Abstract
The present experiment was designed to determine whether ventral tegmental injections of the nicotinic agonist cytisine can establish place preferences. Two groups of rats were tested: one group received injections into the ventral tegmentum and a second group received injections into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum; this latter group was used to assess whether the diffusion of drug into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum might in itself be sufficient to account for the effects associated with injections into the ventral tegmentum. A total of eight sets of injections were made. On days 1, 3, 5, and 7, animals were injected with cytisine (10 nmol per 0.5 microliter per side) and placed in one of the two main compartments of a place-preference apparatus. On days 2, 4, 6, and 8, injections of physiological saline, the drug vehicle, were paired with the other main compartment. Animals that received ventral tegmental injections of cytisine spent significantly more time in the cytisine-paired compartment than in the saline-paired compartment. Animals given cytisine injections into sites dorsal to the ventral tegmentum did not show a preference for the cytisine-paired compartment. These findings provide additional evidence in support of the hypothesis that nicotinic actions at the level of the ventral tegmentum contribute to the reinforcing actions of systemic injections of nicotine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Local infusion of a nicotinic agonist into the VTA, but not the NAc, is sufficient for nicotine place preference in rats.
“This is consistent with previous studies suggesting that nAChRs within the VTA are critical for nicotine reward, because local infusion of a nicotinic agonist into the VTA, but not the NAc, is sufficient for nicotine place preference in the rat (Museo and Wise 1994).”
From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Museo and Wise 1994
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Museo, E., & Wise, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- ORCID
- Wise, Roy A.
- Venue
- Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1179-1186
- ISSN
- 0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018307493
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- cytisine, nicotinic agonists, ventral tegmental area, place preference, self-administration, nicotine reinforcement, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, intracerebral injection
- MeSH terms
- Quinolizidine Alkaloids, Alkaloids, Animals, Azocines, Conditioning, Psychological, Injections, Locomotion, Male, Quinolizines, Ventral Tegmental Area, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review