The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A core group model for disease transmission
Open accessAbstract
Models for sexually transmitted diseases generally assume that the size of the core group is fixed. Publicly available information on disease prevalence may influence the recruitment of new susceptibles into highly sexually active populations. It is assumed that the recruitment rate into the core population is low while disease prevalence is high, core group members mix only with each other, disease levels outside the core are negligible, and some core group members reduce their risk through the use of a partially effective vaccine or prophylactics. A demographic-epidemic model is formulated in which the combined size of the core and non-core population is constant. A simpler version models the epidemic in an isolated core population of constant size under the influence of educational programs and measures that reduce susceptibility. The threshold condition for an endemic infection is determined. Backward bifurcations, multiple infective stationary states, and hysteresis phenomena can be observed even in the simplified version. Abrupt changes in disease prevalence levels may result from small changes in the disease management parameters and do not occur in the absence of such a program. The general conclusion is that partially effective vaccination or education programs may increase the total number of cases while decreasing the relative frequency of cases in the core group. The study throws some new light on the role of the reproduction number in connection with elimination attempts. It shows that although the reproduction number defines the threshold for the spread of the disease in a susceptible population, it is of limited value when elimination of an existing epidemic is planned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Choices, beliefs, and infectious disease dynamics
Auld, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00103-0 · Cited by 134
Schnyder, S. K., Molina, J. J., Yamamoto, R., & Turner, M. S. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2409362122 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Hadeler, K. P., & Castillo-Chavez, C.
- Venue
- Mathematical Biosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-55
- ISSN
- 0025-5564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029486955
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A core group model for disease transmission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0025-5564(94)00066-9
- The paper
- Hadeler, K. P., & Castillo-Chavez, C. (1995). A core group model for disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(94)00066-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.