An introduction to fault tree analysis with emphasis on failure rate evaluation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fault trees are a common safety engineering technique that allows for quantitative analysis, interpretable as deduction in probabilistic logic.
“Fault trees (Nieuwhof, 1975) are a common safety engineering technique that allows for quantitative analysis, which can be interpreted as deduction in probabilistic logic.”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Nieuwhof, 1975
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
Dalrymple, D. "., Skalse, J., Bengio, Y., Russell, S., Tegmark, M., Seshia, S., Omohundro, S., Szegedy, C., Goldhaber, B., Ammann, N., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06624 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nieuwhof, G. W. E.
- Affiliations
- Atomic Energy (Canada) (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Nieuwhof, G.W.E.
- Venue
- Microelectronics Reliability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-119
- ISSN
- 0026-2714 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022253568
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Microelectronics Reliability (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Keywords
- fault tree analysis, OR gate, AND gate, probability estimation, active redundancy, system reliability, fault tree construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review