Cited by 14Risk and Safety AnalysisReliability and Maintenance OptimizationSoftware Reliability and Analysis Research

An introduction to fault tree analysis with emphasis on failure rate evaluation

Nieuwhof, G.W.E.·1975·Microelectronics Reliability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0026-2714(75)90024-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fault trees are a common safety engineering technique that allows for quantitative analysis, interpretable as deduction in probabilistic logic.

    “Fault trees (Nieuwhof, 1975) are a common safety engineering technique that allows for quantitative analysis, which can be interpreted as deduction in probabilistic logic.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieuwhof, G. W. E.
Affiliations
Atomic Energy (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Nieuwhof, G.W.E.
Venue
Microelectronics Reliability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
105-119
ISSN
0026-2714 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022253568
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Microelectronics Reliability (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Keywords
fault tree analysis, OR gate, AND gate, probability estimation, active redundancy, system reliability, fault tree construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review