Mutation and growth rates from Luria-Delbrück fluctuation tests.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Mandelbrot-Koch distribution is usually called so because Koch (1982) made a similar attempt to allow for differential growth rates between nonmutants and mutants.
“Because Koch (1982) made a similar attempt to allow for differential growth rates between nonmutants and mutants, the mutant distribution is usually called the Mandelbrot-Koch distribution.”
From rSalvador: An R Package for the Fluctuation Experiment (2017) · cites this paper as Koch 1982
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Koch, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koch, Arthur L.
- Venue
- Mutation Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 129-143
- ISSN
- 0027-5107 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975177536
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- Luria-Delbrück fluctuation test, mutation rate estimation, quartiles, maximum likelihood estimation, bacterial mutagenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
