The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The present status of higher plant bioassays for the detection of environmental mutagens
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Allium cepa test in environmental monitoring: A review on its application
Leme, D. M., & Marin-Morales, M. A. (2009) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.06.002 · Cited by 1,107
Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug Discovery and Development
Chaachouay, N., & Zidane, L. (2024) · Drugs and Drug Candidates · doi:10.3390/ddc3010011 · Cited by 1,081
Vicia faba bioassay for environmental toxicity monitoring: A review
Iqbal, M. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.048 · Cited by 464
Classification and impact of synthetic textile dyes on Aquatic Flora: A review
Sharma, J., Sharma, S., & Soni, V. (2021) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101802 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, W. F.
- Venue
- Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-185
- ISSN
- 0027-5107 (ISSN-L)
- 1386-1964
- OpenAlex
- W1976874986
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The present status of higher plant bioassays for the detection of environmental mutagens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0027-5107(94)90112-0
- The paper
- Grant, W. F. (1994). The present status of higher plant bioassays for the detection of environmental mutagens. Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(94)90112-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
