Repeated administration of MDMA causes transient down-regulation of serotonin 5-HT2 receptors
Abstract
The present study examined short- and long-term effects of MDMA (3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphetamine) on serotonin (5-HT2 and 5-HT1c) receptors in the brain of the rat. N1-Methyl-2-[125I]lysergic acid diethylamide ([125I]MIL) was used to label these receptors in vitro and in vivo. The usefulness of [125I]MIL for in vivo detection of changes in 5-HT2 receptors was confirmed in preliminary experiments in which rats were treated chronically with mianserin (5 mg/kg, once daily for 10 days). Decreases in specific in vivo binding of [125I]MIL, after treatment with mianserin were found to be of the same magnitude as those determined by others, using in vitro methods. The MDMA (8 doses; 5-20 mg/kg each) was administered to rats over a period of 4 days. At various times after administration of the last dose of MDMA, the binding of [125I]MIL was measured. Acutely, treatment with MDMA (20 mg/kg) reduced specific in vivo binding of [125I]MIL in all regions of brain studied. For example, in the frontal cortex, specific binding of [125I]MIL was decreased by 80% at 6 hr and by 62% at 24 hr, after cessation of treatment with MDMA. Twenty-one days after administration of MDMA however, the number of binding sites for [125I]MIL was back to control levels. Reductions in in vivo binding of [125I]MIL in frontal cortex were dependent on the dose of MDMA injected and were associated with decreases in the number of binding sites for [125I]MIL (Bmax values) in tissue homogenates of the same area. Autoradiographic studies of MDMA-treated rats confirmed the decreased density of 5-HT2 receptors and also suggested that the 5-HT1c receptor of the choroid plexus was not affected. These results indicate that repeated administration of MDMA caused transient down-regulation of 5-HT2 receptors in the brain of the rat. Further, they demonstrated that [125I]MIL is a suitable radioligand for labeling 5-HT2 receptors, both in vitro and in vivo. Once labeled with an appropriate radionuclide for SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) or PET (positron emission tomography), MIL should prove useful for monitoring changes in the density of serotonin receptors in the living mammalian brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repeated doses with MDMA evoked substantial down-regulation of 5HT2-like receptors in rat autoradiographic studies with [125I]-MIL.
“Rat autoradiographic studies with [125I]-MIL (24) revealed that repeated doses with the non-hallucinogenic psychostimulant MDMA evoked a substantial down-regulation of 5HT2-like receptors [68]”
From Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans. (2021) · cites this paper as [68]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “Ecstasy”)
Green, A. R., Mechan, A. O., Elliott, J. M., O’Shea, E., & Colado, M. I. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.3.3 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Dark Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine
Dunlap, L. E., Andrews, A. M., & Olson, D. E. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00155 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Schenk, S., & Highgate, Q. (2021) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15348 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans.
Cumming, P., Scheidegger, M., Dornbierer, D., Palner, M., Quednow, B. B., & Martin-Soelch, C. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26092451 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Rat autoradiographic studies with [125I]-MIL (24) revealed that repeated doses with the non-hallucinogenic psychostimulant MDMA evoked a substantial down-regulation of 5HT2-like receptors [68], which may be a marker of the phenomenon of tolerance to certain hallucinogens.”
Background
- Authors
- Scheffel, U., Lever, J. R., Stathis, M., & Ricaurte, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scheffel, Ursula
- Venue
- Neuropharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 881-893
- ISSN
- 0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034690984
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da006309-05, 5p01ca032845-39)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-06309)
- National Cancer Institute (CA 32845)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES03819, P30ES003819)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- MDMA, 5-HT2 receptor, 5-HT2C receptor, receptor down-regulation, radioligands, mianserin, frontal cortex, choroid plexus, repeated dosing, receptor autoradiography
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autoradiography, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Half-Life, Iodine Radioisotopes, Kinetics, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Male, Receptors, Serotonin, 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, Down-Regulation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review