Cited by 1,007Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour☆

Perret, E.·1974·Neuropsychologia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90047-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 1,007

Authors
Perret, E.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Perret, E.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
323-330
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079995872
Cited by
1,007
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 31
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
left frontal lobe, verbal fluency, Stroop task, response suppression, brain lesions, left hemisphere, frontal lobe function
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dominance, Cerebral, Frontal Lobe, Habits, Humans, Intelligence, Language Disorders, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review