The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if pregnancy intendedness is associated with physical violence, and to identify factors that modify this association. METHODS: Three to 6 months after delivery, we mailed a questionnaire to a population-based sample of 12,612 mothers of infants born during 1990 and 1991 in four states. We used multiple logistic regression to compute odds ratios. RESULTS: The state-specific prevalences (+/- standard error) of physical violence ranged from 3.8 +/- 0.5 to 6.9 +/- 0.8%; the prevalences of unwanted or mistimed pregnancies ranged from 36.9-46.3%. In each state, higher rates of physical violence were reported by women who had fewer than 12 years of education, lived in crowded conditions, participated in the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children, received no or delayed prenatal care, or were of races other than white, under 20 years old, or not married. Regardless of other attributes, women with unwanted or mistimed pregnancies reported higher rates of physical violence than women with intended pregnancies and accounted for 70% of women who reported physical violence. Overall, women with unwanted pregnancies had 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.2) times the odds of experiencing physical violence than did women with intended pregnancies. This association was weaker for women with few social advantages than for those with more advantages. CONCLUSION: Physical violence toward women during the periconceptional and antenatal periods occurs in all sociodemographic groups. Women with unwanted or mistimed pregnancies are at an increased risk for violence by their partners compared with women with intended pregnancies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Health consequences of intimate partner violence
Campbell, J. C. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08336-8 · Cited by 4,055
Researching Domestic Violence Against Women: Methodological and Ethical Considerations
Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Peña, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00001.x · Cited by 619
Forced Sex and Intimate Partner Violence: Effects on Women's Risk and Women's Health
CAMPBELL, J. C., & SOEKEN, K. L. (1999) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801299005009003 · Cited by 371
Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse
Hathaway, J. E., Mucci, L. A., Silverman, J. G., Brooks, D. R., Mathews, R., & Pavlos, C. A. (2000) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00236-1 · Cited by 296
Saltzman, L. E., Johnson, C. H., Gilbert, B. C., & Goodwin, M. M. (2003) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1022589501039 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- GAZMARARIAN, J., ADAMS, M., SALTZMAN, L., JOHNSON, C., CAROLBRUCE, F., MARKS, J., & CHRISTINEZAHNISER, S.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1031-1038
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066611851
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00057-x
- The paper
- GAZMARARIAN, J., ADAMS, M., SALTZMAN, L., JOHNSON, C., CAROLBRUCE, F., MARKS, J., & CHRISTINEZAHNISER, S. (1995). The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00057-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.