The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gestational weight gain, pregnancy outcome, and postpartum weight retention
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the risk of maternal overweight associated with an excessive rate of gestational gain needs to be balanced against the risks of impaired fetal growth associated with a low rate of gain. METHODS: Rate of gestational weight gain was measured prospectively in a sample of 274 young, low-income, and primarily minority women (12-29 years old) with pregravid body mass indices (BMI) in the normal range (19.8-26.0). We defined an excessive rate of gain between 20-36 weeks' gestation as one greater than 0.68 kg/week, and a low rate of gain as one less than 0.34 kg/week. Women were followed-up at 4-6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: Rate of measured gestational gain between 20-36 weeks' gestation was associated with total weight gain based on pregravid weight, with infant birth weight and gestation duration, and with maternal overweight (BMI greater than 26) and weight retention postpartum. Infant birth weight and gestation duration were significantly reduced for women with low rates of gain, and there was no significant difference between women with excessive and moderate gains. Despite little difference in pregravid BMI, women with excessive rates of gain retained more weight overall, attained a greater postpartum BMI, and had higher levels of subcutaneous fat and overweight. Maternal anthropometric status showed little change between 4-6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. CONCLUSION: Weight gained at an excessive rate by women with a pregravid BMI in the normal range does not greatly enhance fetal growth and gestation duration, contributing instead to postpartum maternal overweight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Siega-Riz, A. M., Viswanathan, M., Moos, M.-K., Deierlein, A., Mumford, S., Knaack, J., Thieda, P., Lux, L. J., & Lohr, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 708
Pregnancy: a “teachable moment” for weight control and obesity prevention
Phelan, S. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.008 · Cited by 637
Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy
Muktabhant, B., Lawrie, T. A., Lumbiganon, P., & Laopaiboon, M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007145.pub3 · Cited by 601
Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women
Polley, B., Wing, R., & Sims, C. (2002) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802130 · Cited by 465
Pregnancy weight gain: still controversial
Abrams, B., Altman, S. L., & Pickett, K. E. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1233s · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHOOL, T., HEDIGER, M., SCHALL, J., ANCES, I., & SMITH, W.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-427
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115349399
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gestational weight gain, pregnancy outcome, and postpartum weight retention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00190-3
- The paper
- SCHOOL, T., HEDIGER, M., SCHALL, J., ANCES, I., & SMITH, W. (1995). Gestational weight gain, pregnancy outcome, and postpartum weight retention. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00190-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.