The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy Outcome at Age 40 and Older
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine pregnancy outcome among women age 40 years and older. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, including 1404 pregnant women at least 40 years of age and 6978 controls age 20-29 years, was conducted. The two groups were stratified, according to parity, to facilitate separate analysis. Associations between maternal age and pregnancy outcomes were assessed with the contingency chi 2 or two-tailed Fisher exact test. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate these associations and allowed for calculation of adjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Older gravidas were more likely to develop gestational diabetes (nulliparas: OR 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-3.7; multiparas: OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.4), preeclampsia (nulliparas: OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6; multiparas: OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9), and placenta previa (nulliparas: OR 13.0, 95% CI 4.8-35.0; multiparas: OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.6-15.6). Older women were also at increased risk for cesarean delivery (nulliparas: OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.6-3.7; multiparas: OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.6-4.1), operative vaginal delivery (nulliparas: OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9-2.9; multiparas: OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9), and induction of labor (nulliparas: OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8; multiparas: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Older nulliparas had an increased incidence of abnormal labor patterns (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2), and low 1-minute Apgar scores (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.9). Older multiparas were more likely to experience fetal distress (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8), antepartum vaginal bleeding (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1), and preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.9). CONCLUSION: Although maternal morbidity was increased in the older gravidas, the overall neonatal outcome did not appear to be affected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta–analysis
Jackson, R. A., Gibson, K. A., Wu, Y. W., & Croughan, M. S. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000114989.84822.51 · Cited by 1,160
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study
Khalil, A., Syngelaki, A., Maiz, N., Zinevich, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12494 · Cited by 439
The Perinatal Effects of Delayed Childbearing
Joseph, K. S., Allen, A. C., Dodds, L., Turner, L. A., Scott, H., & Liston, R. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000163256.83313.36 · Cited by 400
The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis
Ananth, C. V., Smulian, J. C., & Vintzileos, A. M. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70017-6 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- BIANCO, A., STONE, J., LYNCH, L., LAPINSKI, R., BERKOWITZ, G., & BERKOWITZ, R.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 917-922
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027010369
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy Outcome at Age 40 and Older. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2
- The paper
- BIANCO, A., STONE, J., LYNCH, L., LAPINSKI, R., BERKOWITZ, G., & BERKOWITZ, R. (1996). Pregnancy Outcome at Age 40 and Older. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(96)00045-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.