CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A model of the Chicxulub impact structure (Yucatan, Mexico) based on its gravity and magnetic signatures

Espindola, J.M., Mena, M., de La Fuente, M., Campos-Enriquez, J.O.·1995·Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
DOI 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Cady, 1977, Calculation of gravity and magnetic anomalies along profiles with end corrections and inverse solutions for density and magnetization, 110, 10.3133/ofr77463 · DOI
  2. Elkins, 1951, The second derivative method of gravity interpretation, Geophysics, 16, 29, 10.1190/1.1437648 · DOI
  3. Evjen, 1936, The place of the vertical gradient in gravitational interpretation, Geophysics, 1, 127, 10.1190/1.1437067 · DOI
  4. Grieve, 1987, Terrestrial impact structures, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 15, 245, 10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.001333 · DOI
  5. Hildenbrand, 1983, FFTFIL. A filtering program based on two-dimensional Fourier analysis of geophysical data, US Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 83-237, 10.3133/ofr83237 · DOI
  6. Hildebrand, 1991, Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, Geology, 19, 867, 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0867:CCAPCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Pilkington, 1992, The geophysical signature of terrestrial impact craters, Rev. Geophys., 30, 161, 10.1029/92RG00192 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rasmussen, 1979, End corrections in potential field modeling, Geophys. Prospect., 27, 749, 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00994.x · DOI
  9. Sharpton, 1992, New links between the Chicxulub impact structure and the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, Nature, 359, 819, 10.1038/359819a0 · DOI
  10. Sharpton, 1993, Chicxulub multiring impact basin. Size and other characteristics derived from gravity analysis, Science, 261, 1564, 10.1126/science.261.5128.1564 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Shuey, 1973, End corrections in magnetic profile interpretation, Geophysics, 38, 507, 10.1190/1.1440356 · DOI
  12. Tanner, 1988, Gravity anomaly map for North America, The Leading Edge, Vol. 7, 15, 10.1190/1.1439456 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Espindola, J. M., Mena, M., de La Fuente, M., & Campos-Enriquez, J. O.
Venue
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
92
Issue
3-4
Pages
271-278
ISSN
0031-9201
DOI
10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review