CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Opposite action of oxytocin to vasopressin in passive avoidance behavior in rats

KOVACS, G, VECSEI, L, TELEGDY, G·1978·Physiology & Behavior
DOI 10.1016/0031-9384(78)90309-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(78)90309-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 81

Authors
KOVACS, G., VECSEI, L., & TELEGDY, G.
Affiliations
University of Szeged (HU)
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
801-802
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0031-9384(78)90309-8
OpenAlex
W2026058298
Cited by
81
References
12
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, vasopressin, passive avoidance, neuropeptides, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Male, Oxytocin, Vasopressins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review