Artificial eggs: Measuring heart rate and effects of disturbance in nesting penguins
Abstract
A technique for the noninvasive measurement of heart rate in incubating penguins is described and evaluated. The technique uses an artificial egg fitted with an infrared sensor. Placing the egg in the nest causes minimal disturbance to the resident penguin; this penguin is then paint-marked so that subsequent measurements may be taken from the unmarked, naive partner once it assumes incubation. Heart rate changes are useful indicators of nesting penguins' reactions to events in their environment because often their behaviour does not appear to vary in response to a threat until the point at which they flee, exposing eggs and chicks to predators. The eggs can be readily transferred from one nest to another. They have been successfully deployed on both African (Spheniscus demersus) and Gentoo Penguins (Pygoscelis papua). The design should be readily adaptable for use with other seabirds and passerines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adélie penguins, African penguins, and little penguins have consistently shown at various breeding sites that human disturbances such as human approach and unregulated tourism increase heart rates and avoidance of nesting near visitor footpaths and reduce breeding success.
“For example, Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) [26,27,28,29,30]; African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) [31,32,33], and little penguins [34,35,36,37] have consistently shown, at various breeding sites, that human disturbances such as human approach and unregulated tourism (i.e., visitor numbers, noise, behaviour and interactions with penguins were uncontrolled) increase heart rates and avoid”
From Effect of Covering a Visitor Viewing Area Window on the Behaviour of Zoo-Housed Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds
Carney, K. M., & Sydeman, W. J. (1999) · Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology · doi:10.2307/1521995 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J., Melfi, V., Burns, A., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10071224 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nimon, A. J., Schroter, R. C., & Oxenham, R. K. C.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1019-1022
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037505879
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- heart rate measurement, artificial eggs, infrared sensors, non-invasive physiological monitoring, predator detection, Spheniscus demersus, Pygoscelis papua
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Heart Rate, Ovum, Physiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review