Cited by 102Polymer crystallization and propertiesFatigue and fracture mechanicsPolymer Science and Applications

A correlation between critical tensile strength and polymer cross-sectional area

Vincent, P.I.·1972·Polymer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0032-3861(72)90116-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tunability of aliphatic polyester block polymer properties by bulky substituents is at least partially due to differences in the chain cross section and entanglement molar mass of the soft segment.

    “This tunability is at least partially due to di ff erences in the chain cross section and entanglement molar mass of the soft segment. 22,75,76”

    From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [75]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vincent, P. I.
Corresponding author
Vincent, P.I.
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1972-12
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
558-560
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092257375
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Fatigue and fracture mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Polymer Science and Applications
Keywords
tensile yield stress, breaking stress, impact response, dynamic mechanical properties, polymer crystallinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review