Cited by 205Thermal properties of materialsPolymer crystallization and propertiesRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies

Thermal conductivity of highly oriented polyethylene

Choy, C.L, Luk, W.H, Chen, F.C·1978·Polymer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0032-3861(78)90032-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choy, C. L., Luk, W. H., & Chen, F. C.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
155-162
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021688336
Cited by
205
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Keywords
thermal conductivity, oriented polyethylene, draw ratio, Takayanagi model, Young's modulus, polymer crystallization, insulators, heat dissipation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review