Multiple morphology in polypropylene/ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer blends
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The selected non-isothermal crystallization temperatures of iPP in isolated polymer domains are ascribed to the homogeneous nucleation mechanism.
“The selected temperatures are ascribed to the homogeneous nucleation mechanism.”
From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Pukánszky, B., Tüdös, F., Kalló, A., & Bodor, G.
- Affiliations
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HU)
- ORCID
- Pukánszky, B.
- Venue
- Polymer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1399-1406
- ISSN
- 0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048873692
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polymer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
- Keywords
- polypropylene/EPDM blends, polymer blends, blend morphology, crystal morphology, recrystallization, phase separation, block copolymers, elastomer content, continuous phase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
