The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pollen Representation, Source Area, and Basin Size: Toward a Unified Theory of Pollen Analysis
Abstract
The concepts of pollen source area and of production and dispersal biases in pollen representation are quantified by means of a simple theoretical model. Source areas and relative pollen representation are shown to depend on basin size according to functions that describe the amount of pollen remaining airborne at increasing distances from single pollen sources. The form of these functions is determined by physical processes. Standard formulas for elevated sources do not apply, but the integrated form of Sutton's equation for particle dispersal from a ground-level source gives useful approximations applicable to pollen transport over a forest canopy. Simulations using this equation yielded source areas that increased realistically with basin size, showed substantial differences between source areas for pollen grains with different deposition velocities, and predicted that lighter pollen grains should become better represented with increasing basin size. All of these predictions are qualitatively consistent with present knowledge of the characteristics of pollen assemblages in different depositional environments. The model further allows parameters that can be estimated by statistical calibration methods to be predicted from underlying physical quantities. This extension suggests procedures for testing the theory with quantitative data on surface pollen and forest composition. Preliminary results showed reasonable agreement between estimated and predicted values of dispersal indices for the most abundant taxa in pollen spectra from the northern midwestern United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conedera, M., Tinner, W., Neff, C., Meurer, M., Dickens, A. F., & Krebs, P. (2009) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.11.005 · Cited by 573
Some implications of paleoecology for contemporary ecology
Schoonmaker, P. K., & Foster, D. R. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858563 · Cited by 62
Spatial Patterns of Atmospheric Pollen Transport in a Montane Region,
Solomon, A. M., & Silkworth, A. B. (1986) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1016/0033-5894(86)90053-0 · Cited by 55
Gaudreau, D. C., Jackson, S. T., & Webb, T. (1989) · Acta Botanica Neerlandica · doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.1989.tb01370.x · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Prentice, I. C.
- Venue
- Quaternary Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-0287
- OpenAlex
- W1995047620
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollen Representation, Source Area, and Basin Size: Toward a Unified Theory of Pollen Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0033-5894(85)90073-0
- The paper
- Prentice, I. C. (1985). Pollen Representation, Source Area, and Basin Size: Toward a Unified Theory of Pollen Analysis. Quaternary Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(85)90073-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.