Optimal measurements for general quantum systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ozawa (1980) established the equivalence between Gudder's and Davies-Lewis' approaches.
“Ozawa (1980) established the equivalence between Gudder's and Davies-Lewis' approaches.”
From Coupling quantum-like cognition with the neuronal networks within generalized probability theory (2025) · cites this paper as Ozawa (1980)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Ozawa, M.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ozawa, M.
- ORCID
- Ozawa, M.
- Venue
- Reports on Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-28
- ISSN
- 0034-4877 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073660871
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reports on Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Keywords
- optimal quantum measurement, axiomatic quantum mechanics, loss functions, statistical decision theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
