Mebendazole in giardial infections: a reply
Abstract
J. Gascon, M. Corachán; Mebendazole in giardial infections: a reply, Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Volume 84, Issue 5
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mebendazole (600 mg daily for 5 days) is not effective for treatment of giardiasis in adult patients.
“Mebendazole (600 mg daily for 5 days) was not effective for treatment of giardiasis in adult patients [280].”
From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [280]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update
Chai, J.-Y., Jung, B.-K., & Hong, S.-J. (2021) · The Korean Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.3347/kjp.2021.59.3.189 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gascon, J., & Corachán, M.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 754
- ISSN
- 0035-9203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064879009
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Amoebic Infections and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Keywords
- mebendazole, giardiasis, Giardia lamblia, antiparasitic treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
