Regulators of denitrification in an organic riparian soil
Abstract
We investigated microbial denitrification in an organic riparian zone and identified factors which regulated its rate. The riparian zone received nitrate from incoming groundwater draining an upslope forest which was spray irrigated with treated effluent. Soil cores were taken from the riparian zone and the following variables were measured: KCl-extracted nitrate, water soluble carbon concentration, organic matter content, moisture content, denitrifying enzyme activity, on-site denitrification rates and natural N2O production. Five sampling surveys were made at a range of field temperatures (12-21 degrees C). The riparian soil was continually water-saturated and contained an average organic matter content of 26%. Nitrate concentration in groundwater entering the upslope edge of the riparian zone was generally greater than 5 mg N l-1. In combination, these factors resulted in an ideal environment for denitrification. Mean and median denitrification rates were found to be 1.12 and 0.95 g N m-2 day-1; while mean and median N2O production rates were 73 and 84 mg N m-2 day-1. These rates were 1-3 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in previous studies of upland soils. Up to 77% of the variation in on-site denitrification rate could be explained by nitrate concentration and denitrifying enzyme activity. Temperature may also have regulated the rate of denitrification; however, insufficient observations at different temperatures were made to fully establish a temperature effect. N2O production was found to be most highly correlated to on-site denitrification rate. Rates of denitrifying enzyme activity were also greater than those generally found in upland soils, the mean and median rates were 810 and 740 ng N g-1 h-1.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Denitrification was the main mechanism for NO3-removal in a riparian wetland receiving sewage that was spray-irrigated onto a nearby forest in Whangamata, New Zealand.
“and was also the main mechanism for NO 3 -removal in a riparian wetland receiving sewage that was spray-irrigated onto a nearby forest in Whangamata, New Zealand (Schipper et al., 1993).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Schipper et al., 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall
Long, L. M., Schipper, L. A., & Bruesewitz, D. A. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.005 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schipper, L. A., Cooper, A. B., Harfoot, C. G., & Dyck, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Scion (NZ)
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ)
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Schipper, L.A.
- Cooper, A.B.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 925-933
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004028952
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Keywords
- biological denitrification, nitrous oxide production, denitrification enzyme activity, nitrate, water-saturated soil, temperature effects, groundwater nitrate, water-soluble carbon, soil organic matter, wastewater irrigation, nitrogen cycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review