Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 13 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The adams conjecture

Open access
Quillen, Daniel·1971·Topology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0040-9383(71)90018-8

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 2 Not valid · 13 Not checked · 30 Own results and interpretations

26 more claims

Create a free account to see all 45 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sullivan, 1970, Lectures given at The Institute for Advanced Study

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Quillen, D.
Corresponding author
Quillen, Daniel
Venue
Topology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1971-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
67-80
ISSN
0040-9383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092511048
Cited by
195
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Topology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Algebra and Number Theory › Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Keywords
real vector bundles, modular representations, algebraic topology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The adams conjecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0040-9383(71)90018-8
The paper
Quillen, D. (1971). The adams conjecture. Topology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(71)90018-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.