The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation
Gray, S. M., & McKinnon, J. S. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.005 · Cited by 593
Evolution of vertebrate visual pigments
Bowmaker, J. K. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.025 · Cited by 451
A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?
Rodd, F. H., Hughes, K. A., Grether, G. F., & Baril, C. T. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1891 · Cited by 361
Evolution of colour vision in vertebrates
Bowmaker, J. K. (1998) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.1998.143 · Cited by 239
New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina
Tang, P. H., Kono, M., Koutalos, Y., Ablonczy, Z., & Crouch, R. K. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.09.002 · Cited by 122
“This was first shown for the guppy (Archer and Lythgoe, 1990) and the salamander (Makino and Dodd, 1996).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, S. N., & Lythgoe, J. N.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-233
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049567935
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90038-m
- The paper
- Archer, S. N., & Lythgoe, J. N. (1990). The visual pigment basis for cone polymorphism in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90038-m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
