The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex
Open accessAbstract
We applied a set of 1- and 2-bar tests to directionally selective (DS) complex cells in the cat's striate cortex, and compared the responses with those predicted by two computational models. Single-bar responses and 2-bar interactions produce distinctive patterns that are highly diagnostic. The observed responses are quite similar to those predicted by a basic (non-opponent) motion-energy model [Adelson & Bergen (1985) Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299]. However, they are not consistent with an opponent combination of energy models, nor are they consistent with any stage of the classic Reichardt model. In particular, the Reichardt model (as well as opponent combinations of energy models) predicts a separable space-time symmetry in the 2-bar interaction that is not observed in our measurements, while the non-opponent energy model predicts an inseparable, oriented interaction very similar to the measured cortical responses. Comparisons between model and measurements suggest possible mechanisms of spatial receptive-field organization and of nonlinear transformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective
Van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Felleman, D. J. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1734518 · Cited by 1,266
A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT
Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00183-1 · Cited by 941
Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys
Movshon, J. A., & Newsome, W. T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-23-07733.1996 · Cited by 651
Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1993) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800010269 · Cited by 594
How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns
Rust, N. C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1786 · Cited by 516
A visual motion sensor based on the properties of V1 and MT neurons
Perrone, J. A. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.03.003 · Cited by 60
The computation of directional selectivity in the drosophila off motion pathway
Gruntman, E., Romani, S., & Reiser, M. B. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50706 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Emerson, R. C., Bergen, J. R., & Adelson, E. H.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-218
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099786589
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.