CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies

Jordan, G., Mollon, J.D.·1993·Vision Research
DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-k
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We have examined the colour vision of 43 female subjects in the age range 30-59 yr of whom 31 were obligate carriers of various forms of colour deficiency and the rest were women who had no known colour-deficient relatives. In the case of all the carriers we established the phenotypes of their colour-deficient sons. As a group, carriers made significantly more errors on the Ishihara plates and showed enlarged matching ranges on the Nagel anomaloscope, but we could not replicate earlier reports of increased error scores on the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test or of systematic shifts in Rayleigh match mid-points. We did find that the colour matches of carriers of deuteranomaly were significantly displaced from those of normals in a ratio-matching task in which a mixture of 546 and 600 nm was matched with a mixture of 570 and 690 nm. Owing to X-chromosome inactivation, women who are heterozygous for anomalous trichromacy ought to have at least four types of cone in their retinae and we ask whether this affords them an extra dimension of colour vision, by analogy to New World monkeys where heterozygous females gain trichromacy in a basically dichromatic species. Many carriers of anomalous trichromacy exhibited no evidence for tetrachromacy, in that they accepted large-field Rayleigh matches following a rod bleach and they were unable to set unique matches in our ratio-matching task. However, eight carriers of anomalous trichromacy--and no other subject--refused large-field Rayleig…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Alpern, 1977, The red and green cone visual pigments of deuteranomalous trichromacy, Journal of Physiology, 266, 647, 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011786 · DOI
  2. Born, 1976, Evidenz fu¨r eine Mosaikstruktur der Netzhaut bei Konduktorinnen fu¨r Dichromasie, Human Genetics, 32, 189, 10.1007/BF00291502 · DOI
  3. Brindley, 1957, Human colour vision, Progress in Biophysics, 8, 49
  4. Brindley, 1960, Physiology of the retina and visual pathway, Monographs of the Physiological Society, 6, 198
  5. Brunner, 1930, U¨ber den Vererbungsmodus der verschiedenen Typen der angeborenen Rotgru¨nblindheit, Archiv fu¨r Ophthalmologie, 124, 1, 10.1007/BF01854131 · DOI
  6. Cohn, 1989, Differences in the responses of heterozygous carriers of colorblindness and normal controls to briefly presented stimuli, Vision Research, 29, 255, 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90129-6 · DOI
  7. Crone, 1959, Spectral sensitivity in color-defective subjects and heterozygous carriers, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 48, 231, 10.1016/0002-9394(59)91239-5 · DOI
  8. De Vries, 1948, The fundamental response curves of normal and abnormal dichromatic and trichromatic eyes, Physica, 14, 367, 10.1016/0031-8914(48)90021-4 · DOI
  9. Este´vez, 1983, The Oscar color vision test: Theory and evaluation(objective screening of color anomalies and reductions), American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 60, 892, 10.1097/00006324-198311000-00004 · DOI
  10. Feig, 1978, On the incidence of unilateral and bilateral colour blindness in heterozygous females, Human Genetics, 41, 313, 10.1007/BF00284765 · DOI
  11. Fleischer, 1920, Die Vererbung geschlechtsgebundener Krankheiten, 42. Versammlung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 4
  12. Gouras, 1968, Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells, Journal of Physiology, 199, 533, 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008667 · DOI
  13. Gru¨tzner, 1976, Coloured stimuli within the central visual field of carriers of dichromatism, Modern Problems of Ophthalmology, 17, 147
  14. Ikeda, 1972, Flicker photometry with chromatic adaptation and defective color vision, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 73, 270, 10.1016/0002-9394(72)90144-4 · DOI
  15. Jacobs, 1984, Within-species variation in visual capacity among squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): Color vision, Vision Research, 24, 1267, 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90181-0 · DOI
  16. Jørgensen, 1992, Different patterns of X inactivation in MZ twins discordant for red-green color-vision deficiency, American Journal of Human Genetics, 51, 291
  17. Kawakami, 1926, Beitra¨ge zur Vererbung der familia¨ren Sehnervenatrophie, Archiv fu¨r Ophthalmologie, 116, 568, 10.1007/BF01853021 · DOI
  18. Krill, 1965, Red-light thresholds in heterozygote carriers of protanopia: Genetic implications, Science, 149, 186, 10.1126/science.149.3680.186 · DOI
  19. Krill, 1964, A hue discrimination defect in so-called normal carriers of color vision defects, Investigative Ophthalmology, 3, 445
  20. Linsker, 1990, Perceptual neural organization: Some approaches based on network models and information theory, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 257, 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.001353 · DOI
  21. Lyon, 1972, X-chromosome inactivation and developmental patterns in mammals, Biological Reviews, 47, 1, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1972.tb00969.x · DOI
  22. Merbs, 1992, Absorption spectra of the red-green and green-red hybrid pigments of anomalous color vision, Science, 258, 464, 10.1126/science.1411542 · DOI
  23. Mollon, 1989, “Tho' she kneel'd in that Place where they grew …”. The uses and origins of primate colour vision, Journal of Experimental Biology, 146, 21, 10.1242/jeb.146.1.21 · DOI
  24. Mollon, 1988, Eine evolutiona¨re Interpretation des menschlichen Farbensehens, Die Farbe, 35, 139
  25. Nagy, 1980, Large-field substitution Rayleigh matches of dichromats, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 778, 10.1364/JOSA.70.000778 · DOI
  26. Nagy, 1981, Four cone pigments in women heterozygous for color deficiency, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 719, 10.1364/JOSA.71.000719 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Neitz, 1986, Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human colour vision, Nature, 323, 623, 10.1038/323623a0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Neitz, 1992, Do people with anomalous colour vision have anomalous pigments?, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.), 8, 754
  29. Neitz, 1992, The molecular genetic basis of polymorphism in normal color vision, Optical Society of America Technical Digest, 4, 14
  30. Nettleship, 1912, Some unusual pedigrees of colour blindness, Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of the United Kingdom, 32, 309
  31. Piantanida, 1971, Phenotypic diagnosis of protan and deutan heterozygosity, Investigative Ophthalmology, 10, 979
  32. Pickford, 1944, Women with colour-blind relatives, Nature, 153, 409, 10.1038/153409a0 · DOI
  33. Pickford, 1949, Colour vision of heterozygotes for sex-linked red-green defects, Nature, 163, 804, 10.1038/163804a0 · DOI
  34. Pickford, 1959, Some heterozygous manifestations of colour blindness, British Journal of Physiological Optics, 16, 83
  35. Reid, 1992, Spatial structure of cone inputs to receptive fields in primate lateral geniculate nucleus, Nature, 356, 716, 10.1038/356716a0 · DOI
  36. Schio¨tz, 19222, Rotgru¨nblindheit als Erbeigenschaft, Klinische Monatsbla¨tter fu¨r Augenheilkunde, 68, 498
  37. Schmidt, 1934, U¨ber manifeste Heterozygotie bei Konduktorinnen fu¨r Farbensinnsto¨rungen, Klinische Monatsbla¨tter fu¨r Augenheilkunde, 92, 456
  38. Schmidt, 1955, A sign of manifest heterozygosity in carriers of color deficiency, American Journal of Optometry, 32, 404, 10.1097/00006324-195508000-00003 · DOI
  39. Shapley, 1986, Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles, Trends in Neuroscience, 9, 229, 10.1016/0166-2236(86)90064-0 · DOI
  40. Siemens, 1926, Eine prinzipiell wichtige Beobachtungu¨ber die Vererbung der Farbenblindheit, Klinische Monatsbla¨tter fu¨r Augenheilkunde, 76, 769
  41. Siemens, 1927, U¨ber “Manifestationssto¨rung” bei rezessiv-geschlechtsgebundener Farbenblindheit, Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft fu¨r Morphologie und Physiologie in Mu¨nchen, 37, 4
  42. Thuline, 1969, Genetics of protan and deutan color-vision anomalies: An instructive family, American Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 581
  43. Tove´e, 1992, The relationship between cone pigments and behavioural sensitivity in a New World monkey (Callithrix jacchus jacchus), Vision Research, 32, 867, 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90029-I · DOI
  44. Verriest, 1963, Further studies on acquired deficiency of color discrimination, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53, 185, 10.1364/JOSA.53.000185 · DOI
  45. Verriest, 1972, Chromaticity discrimination in protan and deutan heterozygotes, Die Farbe, 21, 7
  46. Waaler, 1927, U¨ber die Erblichkeitsverha¨ltnisse der verschiedenen Arten von angeborener Rotgru¨nblindheit, Zeitschrift fu¨r induktive Abstammungs und Vererbungslehre, 45, 279, 10.1007/BF01847031 · DOI
  47. Wieland, 1933, Untersuchungenu¨ber Farbenschwa¨che bei Konduktorinnen, Archiv fu¨r Ophthalmolology, 30, 441, 10.1007/BF01855919 · DOI
  48. Wo¨lfflin, 1923, U¨ber das Vererbungsgesetz der anomalen Trichromaten, Pflu¨gers Archiv, 201, 214, 10.1007/BF01722299 · DOI
  49. Yasuma, 1984, Abnormalities of cone photopigments in genetic carriers of protanomaly, Archives of Ophthalmology, 102, 897, 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030717027 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jordan, G., & Mollon, J. D.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-07
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1495-1508
ISSN
0042-6989
DOI
10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-k
Cited by
91
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review