The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of the degradation of 4-nitrophenol via direct and sensitized photocatalysis in TiO2 slurries
Open accessAbstract
Sensitized photocatalysis has been demonstrated with colored pollutants such as nitrophenols. With visible light excitation of an adsorbed nitrophenol, charge injection into the conduction band of the semiconductor occurs and subsequent transformation of nitrophenols is possible. This work reports the results of experiments of direct and sensitized photocatalysis of 4-nitrophenol using an annular reactor, TiO2, and an artificial light source. The extent of 4-nitrophenol degradation was determined in order to assess mechanistic differences between direct and sensitized photocatalysis. Three major aromatic intermediates were identified for both types of photocatalysis—4-nitrocatechol, hydroquinone, and benzenetriol—but the reaction pathway and distribution of these intermediates are dependent on the photocatalytic mechanism. Nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium ions were analyzed to determine the participation of oxidation vs reduction in the degradation pathway. The systems were also analyzed under N2 atmosphere to determine the role of oxygen in the degradation pathway of 4-nitrophenol. The results presented herein verify those observed in powder systems indicating that sensitization in aqueous systems with a low 4-nitrophenol:semiconductor concentration achieves partial destruction of the parent compound and denitration. It is thought that these chemical transformations may enhance the biodegradability of nitroaromatic compounds, suggesting that sensitized photocatalysis has the potential to be used as a pretreatment process in combination with biological treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide
CARP, O. (2004) · Progress in Solid State Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001 · Cited by 4,566
Composite Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials
Dahl, M., Liu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400634p · Cited by 687
Pathways of solar light-induced photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous TiO2 suspensions
Stylidi, M. (2003) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/s0926-3373(02)00163-7 · Cited by 583
Photodegradation kinetics of 4-nitrophenol in TiO2 suspension
Chen, D., & Ray, A. K. (1998) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00118-3 · Cited by 512
Balasubramanian, G., Dionysiou, D. D., Suidan, M. T., Baudin, I., & Laı̂né, J.-M. (2004) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.04.002 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Dieckmann, M. S., & Gray, K. A.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1169-1183
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003098891
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the degradation of 4-nitrophenol via direct and sensitized photocatalysis in TiO2 slurries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00240-5
- The paper
- Dieckmann, M. S., & Gray, K. A. (1996). A comparison of the degradation of 4-nitrophenol via direct and sensitized photocatalysis in TiO2 slurries. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00240-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.