Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 758

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods

Open access
Alart, P., Curnier, A.·1991·Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Abstract

Abstract A mixed penalty-duality formulation of the frictional contact problem, inspired from an augmented Lagrangian approach is proposed. The continuity of the resulting conewise linear operator is used to establish a uniqueness condition on the coefficient of friction. Modified and generalized Newton methods are examined and sufficient conditions for their convergence conjectured. A cylindrical frictional contact problem assesses the stability of the method. Mixed penalty-duality methods are found more accurate and stabler than penalty methods and as economical as them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90022-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 758

Metadata

Authors
Alart, P., & Curnier, A.
Venue
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-11
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
353-375
ISSN
0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979668890
Cited by
758
References
8
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0045-7825(91)90022-x
The paper
Alart, P., & Curnier, A. (1991). A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(91)90022-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.