Cited by 797Elasticity and Material ModelingAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsContact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities

Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity

Weiss, Jeffrey A., Maker, Bradley N., Govindjee, Sanjay·1996·Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0045-7825(96)01035-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, J. A., Maker, B. N., & Govindjee, S.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Weiss, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
135
Issue
1-2
Pages
107-128
ISSN
0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044148298
Cited by
797
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 42
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
Keywords
transversely isotropic hyperelasticity, incompressible materials, soft biological tissues, constitutive modeling, strain energy function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review