The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditioned defensive burying: A new paradigm for the study of anxiolytic agents
Open accessAbstract
Behavioral paradigms that have been designed to mimic forms of learning that are important for the survival of animals in the wild, rather than to minimize the contributions of adaptive predispositions, may prove to be particularly useful for studying the behavioral effects of drugs. In the present experiments, the propensity of rats to bury sources of aversive stimulation was disrupted in a dose-dependent fashion by a single injection of the anxiolytic drug, diazepam. This suggested that the conditioned defensive burying paradigm could prove to be a valuable addition to the paradigms available for studying anxiolytic effects. Supporting this view were two additional observations. First, the relative potencies of diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, and pentobarbital in the burying paradigm compared favorably with their relative potencies in clinical settings. Second, the effects of anxiolytics on conditioned burying appeared to be dissociable from the effects of other drugs that disrupt this behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This burying behavior is quantifiable and sensitive to anxiolytics45,46.”
From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
Goodman, L., & Gilman, A. (1976) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1097/00006324-197604000-00018 · Cited by 17,456
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,940
On the generality of the laws of learning.
Seligman, M. E. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0029790 · Cited by 1,744
Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning
Bolles, R. C. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0028589 · Cited by 1,610
The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics
Kass, M. A., & BECKER, B. A. (1976) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(76)90265-8 · Cited by 1,356
Some quantitative properties of anxiety.
Estes, W. K., & Skinner, B. F. (1941) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062283 · Cited by 1,350
Bateson, P., & Klopfer, P. H. (1973) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-7569-6 · Cited by 1,279
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0040090 · Cited by 1,201
Geller, I., & Seifter, J. (1960) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00429273 · Cited by 785
Psychopharmacology: A generation of progress
LADER, M. H. (1978) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(78)90014-4 · Cited by 771
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Delay, 1952, Trente-huit cas de psychoses traifees par la cure prolongee et continue de 4560 R.P., C.r. Congr. Med. Alien. Neurol. Lang fr., 50, 497
- Holtzman, 1973, Operant behaviorin the morphine-dependent rhesus monkey, J. Pharmac. exp. Ther, 184, 528
- Jenner, 1967, Comparison of diazepam, chlordiazepoxide and amylobarbitone, Dis. nerv. Syst., 28, 245
- Mandler, 1962, Emotion, Vol. 1
- Pinel, J. P. J. and D. Treit. The conditioned defensive burying paradigm and behavioral neuroscience. In: Behavioral Contributions to Brain Research, edited by T. Robinson. New York: Oxford University Press, in press.
- Ray, 1965, Tranquilizer effects as a function of experimental anxiety procedures, Archs int. Pharmacodyn. Thér., 153, 49
- Sansone, 1975, Benzodiazepines and amphetamine on avoidance behavior in mice, Arch int. Pharmacodyn. Thér., 218, 125
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–421 of 421
Novel targets, biomarkers, and models in the neurobiology of anxiety
Yeung, M. (2015) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r33b5wg9h
BİLİŞSEL VE MOTİVASYONEL UZANIMLARI BAĞLAMINDA TEMEL BİR HEYECAN OLARAK KORKU
Karslı, T. A. (2018) · Çeşm-i Cihan (Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi) E-Dergisi · doi:10.30804/cesmicihan.428634
Kainate receptor auxiliary subunits NETO1 and NETO2 in anxiety and fear-related behaviors
Mennesson, M. (2019) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Coping styles and aggression: a biobehavioral approach
Koolhaas, J. M. (2004) · Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology · doi:10.2502/janip.54.29
Optogenetic Insights into Central Amygdala Motivational Mechanisms
Warlow, S. M. (2018) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Contreras, C. J. J., & Iveth, D. (2014)
Portillo-Salido, E. F., & Vela, J. M. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527619337.ch14
Kallman, M. J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27728-3_27-1
Kallman, M. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27728-3_27-2
Solomon, R. C. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00012991
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Affective valence in the brain: modules or modes?
Schoenbaum, G. M., & Costa, K. M. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.735001483.793560814
Animal Models of Anxiety and Stress-Induced Behavior
Purdy, R. H., Finn, D. A., & Koob, G. F. (2003) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/9780203508169.ch15
Brown, A., Martins, M., Richard, I., & Chaudhri, N. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.3758/s13420-023-00583-3
Conrad, C. D., Peay, D. N., Sladkova, S., Kim, J. L., Donnay, M. E., Acuña, A. M., & Whittaker, K. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1553501
Violle, N. (2008) · doi:10.70675/0fdfdb4bz7b66z4325z94f5z18b1afd69a36
Mahler, S. M. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Differential effects of central oxytocin on social versus cued fear in male rodents
Toth, I. (2014) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · doi:10.5283/epub.27841
Metadata
- Authors
- Treit, D., Pinel, J. P. J., & Fibiger, H. C.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Pinel, J.P.J.
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 619-626
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022356586
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- anxiolytics, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital, aversive stimulation, drug potency, behavioral paradigms, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chlordiazepoxide, Conditioning, Operant, Diazepam, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electroshock, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Pentobarbital, Psychotropic Drugs, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review