Acute and chronic amphetamine treatment: Differential modification of exploratory behavior in a radial maze
Abstract
Mice permitted to explore an 8-arm radial maze displayed high levels of spontaneous alternation as measured by the frequency of visiting (a) the 4 least recently entered arms, (b) the 2 least recently visited arms, and (c) sequences of arms which are adjacent to one another. Acute treatment with low doses of amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) eliminated the alternation tendency. Higher doses (5.0-7.0 mg/kg) also produced marked stimulus perseverance, such that mice tended to revisit the two arms that had been most recently entered. With repeated amphetamine treatment the perseverance tendency was attenuated. The abatement of perseverance in the radial maze did not appear to reflect simply the reduction in the potency of the drug. That is, the reduction of perseverance after chronic exposure to amphetamine was not accompanied by recovery of normal exploratory patterns. In fact, the alternation and adjacent alternation patterns typical of naive animals were absent in mice chronically treated with amphetamine even when tested in the nondrug state. It was suggested that the attenuation of amphetamine induced perseverance after chronic amphetamine administration may reflect a breakdown of normal behavior patterns rather than the development of a genuine tolerance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brut et al. found that acute treatment with low doses of d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) eliminated the alternation tendency, while higher doses (5.0-7.0 mg/kg) produced marked stimulus perseveration in a radial maze.
“Brut et al. found that acute treatment with low doses of d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) eliminated the alternation tendency, while higher doses (5.0- 7.0 mg/kg) also produced marked stimulus perseveration in a radial maze (42).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jian-min, C., Zhi-yuan, W., Shi-xuan, W., Rui, S., Ning, W., & Jin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“0 mg/kg) also produced marked stimulus perseveration in a radial maze (42).”
Background
- Authors
- Bruto, V., & Anisman, H.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 487-496
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079669168
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amphetamine, radial maze, spontaneous alternation, exploratory behavior, chronic drug administration, tolerance (pharmacology and immunology), mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Time Factors, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review