Cited by 62Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Visceral cortex lesions block conditioned taste aversions induced by morphine

Mackey, W.Bruce, Keller, John, Van der Kooy, Derek·1986·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Rats with bilateral ibotenic acid or sham lesions of the visceral (agranular insular) cortex were tested for a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin after five pairings of morphine sulphate injections (15 mg/kg IP) with consumption of a novel solution (0.1% saccharin). Lesioned animals demonstrated no evidence of the morphine-induced CTA that was seen in the sham operated animals. A third group of rats received ibotenic acid lesions but had saccharin consumption paired with saline vehicle injections. This group had the normal preference (seen in naive rats) for saccharin on testing, showing that the visceral cortex lesion had no effect on the ability of the rats to discriminate saccharin from water. In order to test if visceral cortex lesions abolish specifically the CTA induced by morphine, we ran a similar set of CTA experiments using two new novel flavours and either 15 or 75 mg/kg IP lithium chloride (LiCl) as the unconditioned stimuli. Dose dependent CTA's to the LiCl were established in all groups indicating that the visceral cortex plays no role in mediating the aversive effect of LiCl. Using the condition place preference paradigm we investigated the role of the visceral cortex in the expression of morphine's rewarding aspects. Identical place preferences were found in groups of rats with or without visceral cortex lesions suggesting that this cortical region plays no role in either the perception of morphine's rewarding effects or the association of morphine's rewarding properties with sensory stimuli. Visceral cortex lesions also had no effect on the establishment of a conditioned place aversion to a high dose of LiCl (75 mg/kg IP). Thus, visceral cortex appears critical for the establishment of a morphine-induced CTA, but is not crucial for mediating gross taste discrimination, the aversive aspects of LiCl nor the rewarding properties of morphine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90047-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 62

Authors
Mackey, W. B., Keller, J., & Van der Kooy, D.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
71-78
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003290371
Cited by
62
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
agranular insular cortex, conditioned taste aversion, morphine, ibotenic acid lesions, saccharin, lithium chloride, conditioned place preference, morphine reward, conditioned place aversion, taste discrimination
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Operant, Ibotenic Acid, Lithium, Male, Morphine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reinforcement, Psychology, Taste, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review