Visceral cortex lesions block conditioned taste aversions induced by morphine
Abstract
Rats with bilateral ibotenic acid or sham lesions of the visceral (agranular insular) cortex were tested for a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin after five pairings of morphine sulphate injections (15 mg/kg IP) with consumption of a novel solution (0.1% saccharin). Lesioned animals demonstrated no evidence of the morphine-induced CTA that was seen in the sham operated animals. A third group of rats received ibotenic acid lesions but had saccharin consumption paired with saline vehicle injections. This group had the normal preference (seen in naive rats) for saccharin on testing, showing that the visceral cortex lesion had no effect on the ability of the rats to discriminate saccharin from water. In order to test if visceral cortex lesions abolish specifically the CTA induced by morphine, we ran a similar set of CTA experiments using two new novel flavours and either 15 or 75 mg/kg IP lithium chloride (LiCl) as the unconditioned stimuli. Dose dependent CTA's to the LiCl were established in all groups indicating that the visceral cortex plays no role in mediating the aversive effect of LiCl. Using the condition place preference paradigm we investigated the role of the visceral cortex in the expression of morphine's rewarding aspects. Identical place preferences were found in groups of rats with or without visceral cortex lesions suggesting that this cortical region plays no role in either the perception of morphine's rewarding effects or the association of morphine's rewarding properties with sensory stimuli. Visceral cortex lesions also had no effect on the establishment of a conditioned place aversion to a high dose of LiCl (75 mg/kg IP). Thus, visceral cortex appears critical for the establishment of a morphine-induced CTA, but is not crucial for mediating gross taste discrimination, the aversive aspects of LiCl nor the rewarding properties of morphine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lesions of the aIC or pIC both produce no effect on the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP.
“Lesions of the aIC or pIC both produce no effect on the acquisition of morphine-induced CPP”
From The Insula: A Brain Stimulation Target for the Treatment of Addiction (2019) · cites this paper as Mackey et al., 1986
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Mackey, W. B., Keller, J., & Van der Kooy, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-78
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003290371
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- agranular insular cortex, conditioned taste aversion, morphine, ibotenic acid lesions, saccharin, lithium chloride, conditioned place preference, morphine reward, conditioned place aversion, taste discrimination
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Operant, Ibotenic Acid, Lithium, Male, Morphine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reinforcement, Psychology, Taste, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review