Amphetamine-elicited perseverative and rotational behavior: Evaluation of directional Preference
Abstract
Four experiments examined the effects of d-amphetamine on lateralized direction preference, circling behavior, and perseveration. The nature as well as the magnitude of the behavioral response to amphetamine was dependent upon the testing situation. Whereas 5.0-10.0 mg/kg of the drug induced a robust circling behavior in a circular alleyway, it required 10.0 mg/kg of amphetamine to produce a significant turn preference in an open field exploratory situation. In a symmetrical Y-maze, mice displayed spontaneous alternation behavior characterized by an exploratory pattern involving different arm sequences. After amphetamine administration, spontaneous alternation was reduced and pronounced perseverative patterns of exploration were evident at dose levels similar to those that induced rotational behavior. Directional preferences could not account for the exploratory patterns in the Y-maze of animals in the undrugged state, or under the influence of amphetamine regardless of dose. Since lateralized motor asymmetries after amphetamine were limited by the behavioral context in which the effects of the drug were evaluated, it was argued that rotational behavior cannot be considered to be a simple mechanistic behavior. Rather, in addition to the expression of a side preference, it involves a drug-induced perseverative tendency. On the basis of these data, it was suggested that evaluation of the direction of turning in an open field is a less biased measure of spatial preference follow…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several lines of evidence have shown that d-amphetamine causes significantly perseverative patterns (i.e., repetition of location rather than direction) in exploration in the Y-maze.
“In addition, several lines of evidence have shown that d-amphetamine causes significantly perseverative patterns (i.e., repetition of location rather than direction) in exploration in the Y-maze (43, 44).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jian-min, C., Zhi-yuan, W., Shi-xuan, W., Rui, S., Ning, W., & Jin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kokkinidis, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kokkinidis, Larry
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 527-532
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063731913
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- amphetamine, d-amphetamine, circling behavior, rotational behavior, perseveration, spontaneous alternation, Y-maze, open field exploration, spatial preferences
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Stereotyped Behavior, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review