Mouse strain differences in the behavioral effects of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) and the CRF antagonist α-helical CRF9–41
Abstract
The effect of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist alpha-helical CRF9-41 (alpha H CRF9-41; 25 and 50 micrograms) was examined in four strains of mice (BALB/C, NIH Swiss, CF-1, and CD) in the elevated plus-maze anxiolytic test and found to significantly increase percent open arm activity in only the BALB/C mice. A marginal anxiolytic response was obtained in NIH Swiss, while no effect of the antagonist was noted in CF-1 or CD mice in this test. Diazepam (1-4 mg/kg IP) significantly increased percent open arm activity in all four mouse strains. Thus, all strains were sensitive to the effects of a known anxiolytic in this test. The locomotor-suppressing effect of the agonist CRF was assessed in the four strains of mice. While CRF suppressed locomotor activity in each of the strains, the peptide was more efficacious and more potent in the BALB/C strain than in any of the other three strains. The behavioral differences in responsiveness to CRF and the antagonist alpha H CRF9-41 could not be explained on the basis of differential binding of CRF to forebrain membranes in the four mouse strains. These data suggest that the BALB/C mouse is more sensitive to the behavioral effects of CRF and its antagonist than other strains and may be a useful strain for examining the effects of CRF and/or stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific behavioral effects may be induced by specific microbiota.
“Studies with different strains of laboratory mice indicate that there may be specific behavioral effects induced by specific microbiota.”
From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Conti, L. H., Costello, D. G., Martin, L. A., White, M. F., & Abreu, M. E.
- Corresponding author
- Conti, Lisa H.
- ORCID
- Costello, Diane G.
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 497-503
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040300555
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- corticotropin-releasing factor, CRF antagonist, mouse strain differences, anxiolytic effects, elevated plus maze, locomotor suppression, diazepam, BALB/c mice, NIH Swiss mice, CF1 mice, stress
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Diazepam, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Injections, Intraventricular, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred Strains, Motor Activity, Peptide Fragments, Species Specificity, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review