Anxiety, learning, and memory: A reconceptualization
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strong anxiety feelings are no doubt disruptive to behaviour, interfering with interpersonal communication, cognition and learning (Eysenck, 1979; Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994a, 1994b).
“In terms of emotional effects, strong anxiety feelings are no doubt disruptive to behaviour, interfering with interpersonal communication, cognition and learning (Eysenck, 1979;Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002;MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994a, 1994b).”
From The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom (2014) · cites this paper as Eysenck, 1979
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 114 · Cited by 494
- Authors
- Eysenck, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Eysenck, Michael W.
- ORCID
- Eysenck, Michael W.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-385
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094229882
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- anxiety, memory, learning, working memory, processing resources, effort, performance efficiency, theoretical framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
