Structure, variation and synthesis of retrovirus long terminal repeat
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HTLV-2 and BLV have a relatively long R region (over 200 nts), positioning the polyA signal at an unusually long distance from the polyadenylation site.
“HTLV-2, and BLV, which have the polyA signal in the U3 region, the R region is relatively long (over 200 nts), positioning the polyA signal at an unusually long distance from the polyadenylation site (Temin 1981, Derse and Casey 1986).”
From Beyond reverse transcription: molecular mechanisms and emerging paradigms in retroviral replication (2026) · cites this paper as Temin 1981
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 237
- Authors
- TEMIN, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- TEMIN, H
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-3
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012704007
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 40.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- retroviruses, long terminal repeat, retroviral genome
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Retroviridae, RNA, Viral, Virus Replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review