Cited by 76biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineSurgical Sutures and Adhesives

Biodegradable lysine diisocyanate-based poly(glycolide-co-ϵ-caprolactone)-urethane network in artificial skin

Bruin, P., Smedinga, J., Pennings, A.J., Jonkman, M.F.·1990·Biomaterials

Abstract

A biodegradable lysine diisocyanate-based poly(glycolide-co-epsilon-caprolactone)urethane network has been evaluated as a material for the construction of a macroporous bottom layer (dermal analogue) in a two-layer artificial skin. High rates of in vitro degradation were observed; degradation of the porous poly(glycolide-co-epsilon-caprolactone)urethane networks was faster in vivo than in vitro. Subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs showed that the porous polyurethane networks allowed rapid cell ingrowth, degraded almost completely 4-8 wk after implantation and evoked no adverse tissue reaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0142-9612(90)90013-g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degradation of the artificial skin in vivo was faster than that in vitro.

    “The degradation of the skin in-vivo was faster than that in in-vitro.”

    From Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering (2003) · cites this paper as Bruin et al., 1990

  • Subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs showed that porous polyurethane networks allowed rapid cell in-growth, degraded almost completely 4-8 weeks after implantation and evoked no adverse tissue reaction.

    “Subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigs showed that the porous polyurethane networks allowed rapid cell in-growth, degraded almost completely 4-8 weeks after implantation and evoked no adverse tissue reaction.”

    From Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering (2003) · cites this paper as Bruin et al., 1990

  • Polyurethane networks based on LDI and poly(glycolide-co-γ-caprolactone) macrodiol were evaluated by Bruin et al. as two-layer artificial skin.

    “Polyurethane networks based on LDI and poly(glycolide-co-γ-caprolactone) macrodiol was evaluated by Bruin et al. (1990) as two-layer artificial skin.”

    From Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering (2003) · cites this paper as Bruin et al., 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruin, P., Smedinga, J., Pennings, A. J., & Jonkman, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Pennings, A.J.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-05
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
291-295
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125899536
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Keywords
polyurethane, biodegradable polymers, artificial skin, macroporous scaffolds, in vitro degradation, in vivo degradation, subcutaneous implantation, cell infiltration, tissue reaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Artificial Organs, Biocompatible Materials, Biodegradation, Environmental, Cyanates, Guinea Pigs, Lysine, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Polyesters, Skin, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review