Cited by 18Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityMarine and coastal ecosystems

Changes in the zooplankton of Onondaga Lake (NY), 1969–1978

Meyer, Michael A., Effler, Steven W.·1980·Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0143-1471(80)90061-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, M. A., & Effler, S. W.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-10
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
131-152
ISSN
0143-1471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047882828
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Pollution Series A Ecological and Biological (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
zooplankton, Onondaga Lake, hypereutrophic lakes, lake pollution, daphnids, size-selective predation, alewife, zooplankton biomass, phytoplankton grazing, nutrient cycling, metal contamination, lake reclamation, nutrient loading, primary productivity, planktivores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review