Cited by 634Child Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse

Beitchman, Joseph H., Zucker, Kenneth J., Hood, Jane E., daCosta, Granville A., Akman, Donna·1991·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

This is the first of a two-part report that critically evaluates empirical studies on the short- and long-term effects of child sexual abuse. With the exception of sexualized behavior, the majority of short-term effects noted in the literature are symptoms that characterize child clinical samples in general. Among adolescents, commonly reported sequelae include sexual dissatisfaction, promiscuity, homosexuality, and an increased risk for revictimization. Depression and suicidal ideation or behavior also appear to be more common among victims of sexual abuse compared to normal and psychiatric nonabused controls. Frequency and duration of abuse, abuse involving penetration, force, or violence, and a close relationship to the perpetrator appear to be the most harmful in terms of long-lasting effects on the child. The high prevalence of marital breakdown and psychopathology among parents of children who are sexually abused makes it difficult to determine the specific impact of sexual abuse over and above the effects of a disturbed home environment. Given the broad range of outcome among sexual abuse victims, as well as the methodological weaknesses present in many of the studies reviewed, it is not possible at this time to postulate the existence of a "post-sexual-abuse-syndrome" with a specific course or outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0145-2134(91)90038-f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies found the recall and mood effect to be negligible and showed retrospective reports to be highly consistent with prospective designs.

    “However, recent studies found this effect to be negligible and showed retrospective reports to be highly consistent with prospective designs. 35-37”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 634

Authors
Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., daCosta, G. A., & Akman, D.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Beitchman, Joseph H.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
537-556
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2272109968
Cited by
634
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
child sexual abuse, short-term effects, long-term effects, sexualized behavior, sexual dissatisfaction, promiscuity, homosexuality, revictimization, depression, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, abuse severity, perpetrator relationship, parental psychopathology, marital breakdown, adolescents, adults, post-traumatic stress disorder, dissociation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Humans, Personality Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review