The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test of a latent structure of performance ratings derived from Wherry's (1952) theory of rating
Abstract
A model of the latent structure of performance ratings based on Wherry's (19.52) theory of rating was developed which sought to explain relationships between multiple ratings, each of multiple performance dimensions, obtained from multiple rating sources. The model was tested using data obtained from first-and second-level supervisors who rated the performance of approximately 700 entry level clerical and professional/technical employees of 96 insurance, financial, and service organizations. Results only partially confirmed the a priori model, supporting specifications of dimensional true performance and overall rater bias effects, but failing to support specifications of areal (dimensional) bias effects on ratings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employees' rating of leadership is influenced by actual leadership, employees' perception, and random measurement error.
“employees' rating of leadership is influenced by three sections, namely, actual leadership, employees' perception, and random measurement error (Lance, 1994).”
From Humble leadership and its outcomes: A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Lance, 1994
Citations
Cites
The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development
Kegan, R. (1982) · doi:10.4159/9780674039414 · Cited by 1,920
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Humble leadership and its outcomes: A meta-analysis
Luo, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Peng, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980322 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Lance, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lance, C
- ORCID
- Lance, C
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 757-771
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983572046
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- performance ratings, latent structure models, rater bias, performance dimensions, supervisor ratings, clerks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
