The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several previous studies in humans have reported positive correlations between various measures of parasite stress and preferences for putative cues of long-term health, suggesting that individuals place greater emphasis on potential mates' health cues in regions where pathogens impose a greater selection pressure (Gangestad & Buss 1993; Low 1990).”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Gangestad & Buss 1993
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
Trivers, R. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 10,902
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,287
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Self-citationHeritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
(1979) · Cited by 2,524
The evolution of human sexuality
Wilson, G. (1980) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90074-4 · Cited by 2,505
Biological signals as handicaps
Grafen, A. (1990) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8 · Cited by 2,462
Applied Linear Statistical Models.
Barnett, V., Neter, J., & Wasserman, W. (1975) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2984653 · Cited by 2,304
Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871–1971
(1975) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(75)90107-4 · Cited by 2,304
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gangestad, 1992, On the relation between personality and physical attractiveness: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0000337x · Cited by 1,872
Self-citationThe Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty
Rhodes, G. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 · Cited by 1,821
Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism.
Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014823 · Cited by 1,120
Metadata
- Authors
- Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gangestad, Steven W.
- Buss, David M.
- Venue
- Ethology and Sociobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-96
- ISSN
- 0162-3095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039706464
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 8.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Ethology and Sociobiology (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- pathogen prevalence, mate preferences, physical attractiveness, pathogen resistance, human mate choice, cross-cultural comparison, evolutionary psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
